Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:18:01 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>, Nicolas Souchu <nsouch@teaser.fr>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, mike@smith.net.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ppbus if_plip.c Message-ID: <199901121626.JAA07694@pluto.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:41:56 EST." <199901121541.KAA17834@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
><<On Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:29:39 +0100, Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > >> I don't know how the new bus framework will like this kind of >> behaviour, though. > >Easy -- you just declare your device as being of type `TTY|NET' and >the magic just comes naturally. (Except, of course, that this part >isn't implemented yet, but it should be fairly trivial to do once the >interrupt code is debogotified.) Can't we have a more dynamic mechanism than that? You don't want potentially shared interrupts in extra masks unless its absolutely necessary (e.g. PPP is compiled into the kernel, but the net mask is only modified when that line discipline is (de)activated and only for the device interrupts that are engaged in PPP activity). -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901121626.JAA07694>