Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:16:55 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 3. Jul 2012, at 12:39 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> The correct solution to this problem is to remove BIND from the base >> altogether, but I have no energy for all the whinging that would happen >> if I tried (again) to do that. > > I don't think there will be as much whinging as you expect. Times have > changed. > > I'm willing to import and maintain unbound (BSD-licensed validating, > recursive, and caching DNS resolver) if you remove BIND. I'd object to it. Trading one for another without gaining anything does not help us much. Don't get me wrong I have both running for years and even maintain patches for unbound for 2 years now for functionality they do not provide, which named happily gives me. If you want to do this, I would prefer a properly laid out action plan as the import is by far the easiest but the integration into various parts of the system is harder. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F>