Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:05:14 +0000 From: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> To: Alexander Zagrebin <alexz@visp.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and UFS on the same box. Cache memory allocation issue. Message-ID: <d36406630912180905g79c5436eneb2b7c0450572106@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CB674CF3F7F349D39EE24D05B4F8D3DF@vosz.local> References: <398F182D4FC14D43A1CFD89C4D69817C@vosz.local> <4B2B52FD.7070206@FreeBSD.org> <CB674CF3F7F349D39EE24D05B4F8D3DF@vosz.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/12/18 Alexander Zagrebin <alexz@visp.ru> > > > As result UFS returns memory to "free" pool and ZFS can > > allocate it for ARC. > > > It significantly increases ZFS performance. > > > > > > Is there an another workaround? > > > > do you know about the following ZFS loader tunables: > > > > vfs.zfs.arc_min="400M" > > vfs.zfs.arc_max="500M" > > > > These should be added to /boot/loader.conf (and they can of course be > > adjusted to make your system behave well ...) > > Yes, I do. > vfs.zfs.arc_min would be used at this situation, but it seems that setting > this sysctl doesn't help. > > -- > Alexander Zagrebin > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Not really a proper fix but what happens if you have something defined as the l2arc device?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d36406630912180905g79c5436eneb2b7c0450572106>