Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106231007140.21759@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't
remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote:
> Does anyone object to this patch?
>
> David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two
> years with no problems.
>
> I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on
> TMPFS either.
>
>
> Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113)
> +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy)
> @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp)
> return EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental "
> - "feature in FreeBSD.\n");
> -
> vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY);
> error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred);
> VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0);
>
> --
> -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1106231007140.21759>