Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:16:44 +0300 From: vladone <vladone@spaingsm.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: dummynet patch Message-ID: <212250465.20050921141644@spaingsm.com> In-Reply-To: <20050920094753.A88575@xorpc.icir.org> References: <97663975.20050917141303@spaingsm.com> <20050919122154.GM51142@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <477488950.20050920130453@spaingsm.com> <20050920152714.GF24643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1135123196.20050920192026@spaingsm.com> <20050920094753.A88575@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for reply Luigi! I want to implements, but i dont know programming so good to modify dummynet code. My sugestions is because i love dummynet, i think that work great, but need some improvements, to be more adaptable to different situations. For moment will utilize, passing packets to multiple pipe or queue, but for future, if is possibil, please make some changes. Altq is not perfect, because he don't divides proportional bandwidth, only priority that is not very clear what mean. Dummynet is beautiful for this option in queue (weight). This is the reason for what i work with freebsd and not with linux (altq is like htb). I'm fan dummynet!! :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?212250465.20050921141644>