Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Sep 2001 20:49:18 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        keiichi@iij.ad.jp
Cc:        itojun@iijlab.net, net@FreeBSD.ORG, users@ipv6.org, core@kame.net
Subject:   Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup
Message-ID:  <3B95A0BE.9F2BEC4D@elischer.org>
References:  <28752.998915728@itojun.org> <86heutd3z1.wl@keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp> <87sne3y0bq.wl@keiichi00.osaka.iij.ad.jp> <86ae0afhaf.wl@keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Keiichi SHIMA wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> At first, I told a lie in one point,
> 
> > We had removed all the varargs input/output functions from the
> > IPv4/IPv6 stacks of the KAME repositry.  These modifications will
> > make
> 
> We removed all the varargs functions from the IPv4 stack (#ifdef'ed
> for FreeBSD), but preserved for the IPv6 stack.  This is for our
> inter-OS source code maintainancability.  We share all the IPv6 code
> among the *BSDs.  Since we are developing the IPv6 stack actively now,
> it is important for us to reduce the difference among several OSes.

that suits me.  IPV6 is under active development and 
not yet a core function. It is expected to be


1/ changing
2/ suboptimal (due to debugging etc)
3/ not completely tidied up


Firstly let me apologise somewhat for the strength of my complaints recently.
I was less polite than I should have been.
Also I wish to thank you about these changes.

> 
> Anyway, as we don't have any varargs input/output functions in FreeBSD
> code any more, some of annoying warning messages have disappeared.

thankyou

> 
> > it easier to import KAME code into FreeBSD4/5.  Now we are testing the
> > code with KAME/FreeBSD4 and it looks OK.  I will soon make a patch for
> > FreeBSD5 and post it to the related mailing lists for review.
> 
> Please look into the attached patch for FreeBSD-current.

I am looking now

they seem fine..
If you wish I could commit them..
have you tested them?

Also, there was some code in the previous patch from KAME
that had some confusion.
at the bottom of encap4_input()

can you let me know what the correct cod eshould look like..
(keeping in mind that ipip_input() just calls rip_input()
and that ipip_input is not compiled by default in LINT so lint failed to compile
as it was.)

-- 
+------------------------------------+       ______ _  __
|   __--_|\  Julian Elischer         |       \     U \/ / hard at work in 
|  /       \ julian@elischer.org     +------>x   USA    \ a very strange
| (   OZ    )                                \___   ___ | country !
+- X_.---._/    presently in San Francisco       \_/   \\
          v

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B95A0BE.9F2BEC4D>