Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:23:46 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kmem_map too small: 3832475648 total allocated Message-ID: <20100429212345.GA2215@lonrach.keltia.net> In-Reply-To: <n2m2e027be01004290844k51dd6060q77375e894ff4efc4@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BD8F7FA.2080103@jrv.org> <20100429145334.GB62822@roberto-al.eurocontrol.fr> <n2m2e027be01004290844k51dd6060q77375e894ff4efc4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Tom Evans: > Citation needed? I have a file server running amd64 8-STABLE with 4GB > of RAM, 6 x 1.5 TB drives in raidz, and have never had any problems > with memory usage. Are you saying that after my next update, adding > another 6 x 1.5 TB drives, it will start being flaky and/or panicing > with kmem_map too small errors? I don't have the citation handy but it was on the opensolaris forum in the zfs community. I understand that this is FreeBSD we're speaking about but the figure comes from the fact that ZFS (and particularly the ARC cache) does take a lot of memory. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100429212345.GA2215>