Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:35:23 +0930
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        gnn@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Subject:   Re: TSC Timecounter and multi-core/SMP
Message-ID:  <200804181235.29530.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <48080276.3040203@elischer.org>
References:  <m2d4oy8n30.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20080418003203.GB11705@dragon.NUXI.org> <48080276.3040203@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > The TSC on K8 is not invariant - its rate of change is affected by
> > P-state changes.
> >
> > The TSC on Greyhound (Family 10h) is invariant.
> > [but as stated above, is not synced with other cores]
>
> You'd think that an invariant sync'd clock (fast to read) of some
> type would have been done by someone by now.. The software people
> have been asking for this for the last decade at least.

Probably because it's very very difficult to get right :)	

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200804181235.29530.doconnor>