Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:24:52 -0800 From: "oldfart@gtonet" <oldfart@gtonet.net> To: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Do we need a 3. level between stable and cuurent? Message-ID: <BIEHKEFNHFMMJEKCDMLNEENKCEAA.oldfart@gtonet.net> In-Reply-To: <3A915663.5348C9F3@directski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I stand corrected... > -----Original Message----- > From: Dermot McNally [mailto:dermot@directski.com] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:23 AM > To: oldfart@gtonet.net > Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG > Subject: Re: Do we need a 3. level between stable and cuurent? > > > "oldfart@gtonet" wrote: > > > -RELEASE, I thought, is for production. Although, it's true, > -STABLE rarely > > has a stop. > > Nope, -STABLE is for production, -RELEASE is for installing immediately > prior to upgrading it to -STABLE. X.X-STABLE = X.X-RELEASE + fixes + > carefully selected stuff that has been well tested in -CURRENT. > > Dermot > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Dermot McNally, Chief Technical Officer, Directski.com > dermot@directski.com http://www.directski.com - ski the web To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BIEHKEFNHFMMJEKCDMLNEENKCEAA.oldfart>