Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:04:10 +0200 From: "Ido Barnea" <ido@cwnt.com> To: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <drwilco@drwilco.net>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Help with net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen Message-ID: <C7DF4400240AFB4095D98C7C6EC2A34A083372@bart.cwnt.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rogier R. Mulhuijzen [mailto:drwilco@drwilco.net] > Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:15 PM > To: Ido Barnea; freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Help with net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen >=20 >=20 > Is there a write-up anywhere about what variables are=20 > tuneable, where to=20 > look to see if they need tuning and what the=20 > downsides/ramifications are? Here's a few links you can look at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-ke= rnel-limits.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/perf-bsd44.html http://www.daemonnews.org/200204/answerman.html Hope they are helpfull. >=20 > I already discovered kern.ipc.maxsockbuf needs to be raised=20 > to accommodate=20 > raising the various send and recv spaces. =3D) >=20 That's true if most of your data goes to a single socket. > Greets, >=20 > DocWilco >=20 >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C7DF4400240AFB4095D98C7C6EC2A34A083372>