Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 02:15:21 +0800 (WST) From: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM> To: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> Cc: ache@astral.msk.su, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT log_accum.pl Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951113020925.233E-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: <199511121803.KAA02195@corbin.Root.COM>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, 12 Nov 1995, David Greenman wrote:
> >In message <Pine.BSF.3.91.951103212121.283A-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM>
> > Peter Wemm writes:
> >
> >>I'm running a variant of what you proposed in my kernel at the moment..
> >> if (!SESS_LEADER(p))
> >> printf("setlogin called from a non session leader, pid %d\n", p->p_pid);
> >
> >>I do not doubt that your fix is a "good thing" and will be required sooner
> >>or later, I just want to make sure we are not going to to have a hundred
> >>bug reports "xdm doesn't work any more" or some other program that we're
> >>not aware of yet.
> >
> >Peter, do you have any progress in this issue for now?
> >Maybe it is time to commit my fix to -current?
>
> If we decide to change setlogin() so that it only works for session
> leaders, then I'd prefer that we leave out the printf(). If you want to add
> that to your own sources, fine, but I prefer to keep console noise minimized
> to important failures.
Yes; If it was to go in, IMHO it would have been better with log() anyway
(like bde's "" == "." change).
I guess the real question is; are we prepared to loose XFree86 3.1.2
xdm compatability until their next release? Maybe this isn't such a big
deal anyway, because running xdm corrupts the session "name" anyway.
-Peter
> -DG
>
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.951113020925.233E-100000>