Date: 31 May 2000 13:02:39 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/tcl80/pkg DEINSTALL.tclsh ports/lang/tcl82/pkg DEINSTALL.tclsh ports/lang/tcl83/pkg DEINSTALL.tclsh Message-ID: <vqcpuq2pjxc.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek's message of "Wed, 31 May 2000 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT)" References: <200005311741.KAA54827@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Add a DEINSTALL.tclsh everywhere there exists an INSTALL.tclsh.
Now that I think about it, why aren't these called simply "INSTALL"
and "DEINSTALL"? It's not like their usage are conditional or
something.
Actually they used to be conditional on the files existing (i.e., ".if
exists(${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl80/pkg/INSTALL.tclsh") since people could
be portcheckout'ing and not have the entire ports tree but they still
could have been called "INSTALL" for the benefit of the ports that
actually own them....
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcpuq2pjxc.fsf>