Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 23:27:01 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-hackers-freebsd-org952@ketas.si.pri.ee> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgfe Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=u0qF6vvMsO5_Y6LLjxUeX14LnLfe4TJ=Spk6gRXqgbg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2C53379A-9D67-415B-820C-CF084408206E@ketas.si.pri.ee>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
oooo, i quite like this! -a On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 at 02:32, Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-hackers-freebsd-org952@ketas.si.pri.ee> wrote: > > i'm currently in progress of putting pkgfe back into ports > > that's my 20+ year old project for ports tui i created out of frustration of having to copy and paste things around a terminal > > i think to this day we have no proper package search install delete ui. i think some barebones is in installer now? > > anyway why not have more than one way, like unix! > > however it's like effort to port this to poudriere+pkg use. to be honest it still includes features that only worked pre-pkgng times. i so far have used it with ports tree and portupgrade to this day > > so what would anyone here think of this? even 20y ago i included features there that i didn't use personally but i thought others could fine useful like execute as root command prefix and so on > > all the information below, complete with oldschool pages and questionable "version control" the 22 year old me created > > > <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=295922>; > > <http://ketas.si.pri.ee/pkgfe/>; > > <https://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/pkgfe/>; > > <https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/pkgfe/>; >home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=u0qF6vvMsO5_Y6LLjxUeX14LnLfe4TJ=Spk6gRXqgbg>