Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:01:20 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        ticso@cicely.de
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.3-BETA1 for Alpha available
Message-ID:  <20040829190120.GA45159@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20040829131149.GA59909@cicely12.cicely.de>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.33.0408290044080.15329-100000@servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de> <20040829095002.GA43484@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040829131149.GA59909@cicely12.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote..
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:50:02AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:40:33AM +0200, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote..

...

> > > On AXPpci33 it dies while testing sym0. Before this sym0 reports:
> > > sym0: <810> port 0x10100-0x101ff mem 0x81854100-0x818541ff at device 6.0 on pci0
> > > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-10, SE, parity checking
> > > CACHE TEST FAILED: timeout.
> > > sym0: CACHE INCORRECTLY CONFIGURED.
> > > 
> > > fatal kernel trap:
> > > 
> > >     trap entry     = 0x4 (unaligned access fault)
> > >     cpuid          = 0
> > >     faulting va    = 0xdeadc0dedeadc0de
> 
> Mmm - it's dereferencing nonsense.
> Guess this bug is old and just triggered as a result of the timeout.
> I'm missing an IRQ in the probe, so the timeout is reasonable.
> Normaly we should see:
> sym0: interrupting at ISA irq 11
> A complete boot -v output would be interessting to see routing
> decisions - sounds much like someone broke IRQ routing on alpha.
> LCA based alphas are the only alphas so far that we have enabled
> interrupt routing and possibly the only alphas that share ISA and PCI
> interrupts.

Ruslan just reported that BETA1 just installed fine on his NoName
(see his posting to alpha@).  

> > Hmm.... Both PC64 and AXPpci33 are EV4x machines..  Hmm.. all my test
> > boxes are >= EV5
> 
> To be exact AXPpci33 is LCA with an 21066 CPU or LCA45 with an 21066A
> CPU, which is very similar to EV4 and EV45.

Ruslan has a 166MHz, so an 21066 CPU.

> It seems that those boards are sold with 21066 CPUs only and that
> 21066A only made it into Alphabooks and maybe some Multias.

Not true.  I at some point had a 233MHz NoName.  Don't know if it
was originally supplied with that CPU.  I also had a 233MHz Multia
at some point.  Whatever..

W/
-- 
Wilko Bulte				wilko@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040829190120.GA45159>