Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 20:16:58 +0100 From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, peter@haywire.dialix.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW and SCREEND Message-ID: <8296.809119018@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Aug 1995 21:03:49 %2B0200." <199508221903.VAA00693@gvr.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199508221903.VAA00693@gvr.win.tue.nl>, Guido van Rooij writes: >Just throw away *every* fragment that has as its start byte a byte in >the TCP/IP header. (so smaller then 40) That'd be my opinion as well. Is there any DOCUMENTED & VALID reason for having a fragment start with a byte offset into the header? Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8296.809119018>