Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:23:26 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*? Message-ID: <F04BCAF6-2478-4724-A7E6-94BD43BE77DB@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <15566.1234900800@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <15566.1234900800@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <D1292F9E-BF53-443F-9E63-92D527A41A3B@mac.com>, Marcel > Moolenaar wri > tes: > >> 1. We need to expose the current bootcode through >> kern.geom.confxml > > No. > > No. > > NO. > > We do not want arbitrary large binary blobs in the confxml > output. I'm not going to start a discussion on arbitrariness and largeness of bootcode. Instead, let me just ask: Do you have alternatives? -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F04BCAF6-2478-4724-A7E6-94BD43BE77DB>