Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:17:45 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" <biancalana@gmail.com> To: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: trustedbsd-discuss@trustedbsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAC Framework KPI changes on the way in 8-CURRENT Message-ID: <8e10486b0710232017o11b0213fjbeb8192ad8aa80c5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071023235444.E70336@fledge.watson.org> References: <20071023235444.E70336@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/23/07, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Dear all, Hi Robert ! > > > I'll post regexp's to trustedbsd-discuss in a few days once it's all sorted > through. I realize this is somewhat disruptive for policy maintainers, and > apologize with that. However, the new naming scheme is both significantly > more sensible than the old one (which was evolved rather than designed), and > also will allow us to more easily make use of Mac OS X security policy modules > that may be made available as open source. If you are a policy maintainer and > have any trouble getting over the bump, please let me know and I'll be happy > to lend a hand. I had hoped to get these changes in for 7.x, but due to some > rather unfortunate timing of things outside the FreeBSD world, that was not > possible. Thank you so much for your work! Excuse me for "hijack" your post, but I think that the question is pertinent... Is there any news about the NFSv4 ACL implementation in FreeBSD ? Regards,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e10486b0710232017o11b0213fjbeb8192ad8aa80c5>