Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:41:50 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>
To:        "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>
Cc:        Paul Jansen <vlaero@yahoo.com.au>, freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: your mail
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102070738040.23420-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010207081758.B16642@peorth.iteration.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> The point is that modern (or old) embedded systems have flash or
> other forms of non-volatile storage rather than using floppies.
> And the 1.44mb limit is somewhat too small.

And seeing as you can now get a 8mb flash disk which plugs directly into
the IDE port from several sources for around $35-40, and a 16mb version
for $55 ish (and bigger versions also for slightly more), a floppy looks
less and less attractive.

That said, I think the real attractiveness of PicoBSD is the small
utilities and the methods developed of squeezing "every" unneeded byte out
of the kernel as 8 or 16mb is not endless...

- Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604      http://www.imach.com
Solutions for your high-tech problems.                  (406)-442-6648
----------------------------------------------------------------------



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0102070738040.23420-100000>