Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:40:06 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat]) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106241337350.53359-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200106231706.f5NH6a872811@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > Ok, Bruce... the symlink patch has been sitting in my tree for a week > now. I am going to let you decide whether I should commit it or not. > If not, into the trash heap it goes. This is likely to be the only > way the problem will be solved since creating an empty symlink via > the 'ln -s' utility is perfect legal. So, in or out? In. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0106241337350.53359-100000>