Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 00:36:45 -0700 From: Yuri Victorovich <yuri@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_git=3A_a816f578c1dc_-_main_-_science/py-tweedledum?= =?UTF-8?B?OiB1cGRhdGUgMS4xLjEtMjAyMjExMjMg4oaSIDEuMi4w?= Message-ID: <fed2026d-7cb4-4c44-8f48-69a72665b0da@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86v7aw7fne.fsf@ltc.des.dev> References: <6a46a5b1.2276e.226b6bfe@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <86zf096tnc.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <fbe71b44-0fce-4aa3-8771-bd82408eee5d@FreeBSD.org> <86v7aw7fne.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 7/2/26 23:26, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Yes it was, and you received several emails about it, which you ignored, > just like you ignored the complaints when you broke Gnome last week. Like I said, I didn't notice it. >> The review has DISTVERSIONSUFFIX=-20260518 which is a minor thing and >> I don't think it should be in the port. > You're wrong, it was essential, because now there is no way to > distinguish this version, built from a specific pre-release commit, from > a later version built from a different pre-release commit, or from the > actual 1.2.0 release. This is arguable. There is no such release 1.2.0 to begin with. 1.2.0 is only in the development source code and might never be released which would make this commit invalid. This is the upstream author's fault that he makes major changes over the years and never makes any releases with these changes. Yurihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fed2026d-7cb4-4c44-8f48-69a72665b0da>