Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:51:37 -0500
From:      "Scott T. Hildreth" <shildret@fbsd1.dyndns.org>
To:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/102474: linux_base-fc-4_8 appears broken, does not allow to run Linux binaries
Message-ID:  <1156909898.89850.86.camel@fbsd1.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200608251030.k7PAUQDK083478@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200608251030.k7PAUQDK083478@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well I am trying to follow the threads, I know I am missing something 
here.  To make sure I removed all linux packages.  I reinstalled, I do 
get this link created by the linux_base-fc4 or linuxpluginwrapper is
creating it.

lrwxrwxrwx  1 root  wheel  19 Aug 29 20:52 /usr/compat/linux/lib/libpthread.so.0 -> libpthread-2.3.6.so

Then I can run acroread, but the browser plugins aren't working.  
The errors messages are,

LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so [Shared objec
t "libpthread.so.0" not found, required by "libflashplayer.so"]

...my head is swimming now, I can't figure out why libpthread.so.0 cannot not be found.

LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [/usr/X11R
6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "__ctype_b_loc"]



On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 10:30 +0000, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR ports/102474; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
> Cc: Markus Hoenicka <markus.hoenicka@mhoenicka.de>,
>         freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports/102474: linux_base-fc-4_8 appears broken, does not allow to run Linux binaries
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:23:47 +0400
> 
>  On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:23:20 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>  > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:28:36 +0400):
>  > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:48:08 +0200 Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>  > >> Boris Samorodov writes:
>  > >
>  > >>  > Can you give me a link to ktrace.out for
>  > >>  > "ktrace -i /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig"?
>  > >
>  > >> Yes, please have a look at:
>  > >
>  > >> http://refdb.sourceforge.net/stuff/ldd/ktrace.out
>  > >
>  > > Aha, /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd is a script. Can't say for sure should
>  > > it work or not but something strange does exist:
>  > > -----
>  > >  24546 ktrace   RET   ktrace 0
>  > >  24546 ktrace   CALL  execve(0xbfbfe85e,0xbfbfe75c,0xbfbfe768)
>  > >  24546 ktrace   NAMI  "/compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd"
>  > >  24546 ktrace   NAMI  "/bin/sh"
>  > >  24546 ktrace   NAMI  "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1"
>  > >  24546 sh       RET   execve 0
>  > > -----
>  > >
>  > > Alexander, can you comment on this behaviour? Thanks!
>  
>  > The kernel contains code to detect if a linux program is a script and
>  > contains "#!" at the beginning. If it detects this, it tries to start
>  > the linux version of the interpreter. At least it should do that. If
>  > the above isn't a cut-down version of the ktrace, and if the linux ldd
>  
>  It is a cut-down version of ktrace. I expected that a linux shell
>  should be execed, but not a native one. And later this shell is trying
>  to find /lib/ld-linux.so.2 and boils out!
>  
>  > does contain "#!" as the first two characters of the file (I can't
>  > check ATM), then there's something wrong here.
>  
>  Yep:
>  -----
>  # uname -a
>  FreeBSD bsam.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Sat Aug 19 00:13:01 MSD 2006     bsam@bsam.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
>  # head -1 /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd
>  #! /bin/sh
>  -----
>  
>  > Regarding the lib problem in the PR: FreeBSD 6.x and fc4 contain a
>  > libc.so.6. So the order of the ld path (/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf
>  > or how it is spelled) may matter. I don't have a 6.x system to test
>  > this, so someone has to play around with it and report here (don't
>  > forget to rerun the linux ldconfig with the '-R /compat/linux' option
>  > after each change). If this doesn't solve the problem, I need to see
>  > the complete ktrace of a failing program which tries to link with
>  > libc.so.6.
>  
>  The lib problem is already fixed (non-standard file /usr/lib/libc.so.6
>  existed at the submitter's machine). Thanks for your help.
>  
> 
>  WBR
>  -- 
>  Boris Samorodov (bsam)
>  Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
>  FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
-- 
Scott T. Hildreth <shildret@fbsd1.dyndns.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1156909898.89850.86.camel>