Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:02:21 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua> To: Panagiotis Astithas <past@netmode.ntua.gr> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.4.2-beta Message-ID: <20030416120221.A57339@phantom.cris.net> In-Reply-To: <3E9D1780.1060501@netmode.ntua.gr>; from past@netmode.ntua.gr on Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:42:40AM %2B0300 References: <20030415223630.GB27683@vega.vega.com> <20030415205756.36a975d9.kabaev@bellatlantic.net> <20030416110349.A56908@phantom.cris.net> <3E9D1780.1060501@netmode.ntua.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:42:40AM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > Opposite statement -- Java Source License (holding by FreeBSD Foundation). > > But there's still lot of work before I'll switch from SCSL to Sun Partner > > Sources... :( > > I wonder how would these two differ. Do you get the sources to some > com.sun.* classes with the Sun Partner Sources, or maybe use their > up-to-date CVS/SCCS/whatever repository? Did not even checked it. Most notable difference between SCSL and SPS is up-do-date sources. I.e. sources released under SCSL usually are releasing about 2 months after acutal release and are just snapshot of tree. And SPS sources access (as I understand) provide access to today's sources with all bugfixes, but without possibility to make source release (i.e. it's not possible to release patchsets or anyting like that). After switch to SPS we'll have binary releases only.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030416120221.A57339>