Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:32:30 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Qing Li <qingli@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204902 - in head/sys: net netinet Message-ID: <4B9C3CAE.1040102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100310235840.GA70978@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201003090111.o291Bj79062503@svn.freebsd.org> <201003101050.46696.jhb@freebsd.org> <20100310160858.GC58634@dragon.NUXI.org> <201003101301.06583.jhb@freebsd.org> <20100310235840.GA70978@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/10/10 15:58, David O'Brien wrote: > I guess I don't get it - we have got reports of this badly affecting > basic functionallity for several people and yet we wont fix stock > sources? This is serving users well? Qing, I appreciate the care you took in not wanting to add more breakage to something already broken, however I have to agree with David here. Leaving something so fundamental broken while you investigate the change was not the optimal way to handle this. Either committing the patch you had, or backing out the change while investigating the proper solution would have been preferable (IMO). Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B9C3CAE.1040102>