Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 20:15:29 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@atg.aciworldwide.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Idea for project: Make cpp do unifdef service... Message-ID: <78040.1004987729@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:48:16 MST." <200111051848.fA5ImG0H012663@atg.aciworldwide.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200111051848.fA5ImG0H012663@atg.aciworldwide.com>, Lyndon Nerenberg writes: >> >Concidering that cpp is vendor software, there would need to be a strong >> >case for it. What is wrong with just fixing unifdef(1) itself? >> >> Nothing, apart from the fact that it would be much more work. >> >> I'm pretty sure that it would be possible to get the GCC crew to >> adopt a patch which added functionality to cppp. > >Where does this leave people using alternate C compilers (e.g lcc)? unifdef is not something you use often so I don't see the issue... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78040.1004987729>