Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 17:32:53 -0300 (ART) From: Jose Albores <jote@bigfoot.com> To: Newbies <freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <XFMail.990701173253.jote@bigfoot.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990701024207.9223l-100000@geeky1.ebtech.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry but I just came into this list yesterday.
As I see this is a technical + opinion mailing list (and I came late into this
discussion):
Can anyone issue some differences between Linux (I am actually RedHat 5.2 user
and tried Debian previously) and FreeBSD? I know there are some variations
among Sys-V vs. BSD Un?x's, but I am mostly interested to know differences
referring to stability and "upgradability" of one vs. others.
If it's impossible through the list, please feel free to do this in private.
TIA
El 01-Jul-99 Paul Anderson dijo:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Ulairi wrote:
>
>> NT is about 7 years old. Give it time,
>> perhaps it'll grow up a tad.
>>
> And it's already a huge kludge. The problem is that Microsoft won't admit
> [...]
---
Jose Albores <jote@bigfoot.com>
Tu "fortune":
There are no manifestos like cannon and musketry.
-- The Duke of Wellington
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990701173253.jote>