Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:55:26 +1100 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade Message-ID: <20101101045526.GA27329@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <1288549637.1553.14.camel@xenon> References: <AANLkTimKKVeR_EsoDQv_3r%2B8hdh%2Ba9K_bAxWx4qi_cgW@mail.gmail.com> <20101031171808.GA22758@ozzmosis.com> <1288549637.1553.14.camel@xenon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun 2010-10-31 19:27:17 UTC+0100, Michal Varga (varga.michal@gmail.com) wrote: > > UPDATING should probably be amended upstream to correct this... > > > > Regards > > Andrew > > While I'm certainly no authority on the issue, I think that's the wrong > approach and generally (really not speaking about any specific case) - > people, or in this case, system administrators, should know how to > operate their working environment and don't just blindly enter commands > "as they found them", without trying to understand what will happen next > and/or how it will get interpreted. Indeed - that's why I wrote "probably". I can imagine arguments for and against, as you describe...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101101045526.GA27329>