Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:10:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253861] service power_profile should conform to standards: act on "describe" command Message-ID: <bug-253861-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253861 Bug ID: 253861 Summary: service power_profile should conform to standards: act on "describe" command Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: misc Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: walter.von.entferndt@posteo.net $ service power_profile describe Usage: /etc/rc.d/power_profile [0x00|0x01] Exitcode 1 Note: I could easily, but I do not, supply a patch. Honestly IMHO the one = who wrote that script, and noone else please, should fix that. The reason is t= hat I'm a little bit upset & sad about such bugs, because it's obvious that the= one who wrote that script never tested it (a desc=3D"..." is in the script).=20 Supplying a patch for these kind of bugs fosters the Peter's principle, i.e. people are promoted because they're doing good -> most people are overwhelm= ed with their duties. I don't think it's wise to clean up after someone else, while this one does the same mistakes over & over again in his/her next projects. Although that's typical in the business world, I'd be glad if it could be done better in the FreeBSD project. If it's complicated & hairy, hey, to err is human. But when it's so simple= , I get nervous, to say it politely. Regards --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253861-227>