Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:08:49 -0500 From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix? Message-ID: <cone.1171915729.745199.41200.5001@35st.simplicato.com> References: <cone.1171556679.453588.55347.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <i2hat2l2ml6q1bfhv1t8ja63ghu5jdkocv@4ax.com> <cone.1171743956.652183.78181.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <200702172201.l1HM1BnR009915@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa writes: >>Great. That sound promissing. >>Is this with i386 or amd64? > > i386. clamav, spamassassin/mimedefang are all slower on amd64 Thanks for the feedback. How much memory on your machine(s)? Part of the reason I was thinking amd64 is because the servers have 4GB. Doesn't one need PAE at 4GB and above? We get our machines installed with FreeBSD and the vendor has been putting PAE on machines with 4GB, but I am wondering if it is even needed. > We were using the dev version and prev release version out of the > ports and have now switched to .90. I see a port for it now. Will give it a try. > .90. Changing to libthr makes it work just fine. Thanks again for all the feedback.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cone.1171915729.745199.41200.5001>