Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:18:00 -0800 (PST) From: John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201181114520.19710@kozubik.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201181132450.51158@fledge.watson.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112211415580.19710@kozubik.com> <4F1543C2.8050404@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201181132450.51158@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Robert Watson wrote: > > I think John gets a lot of what he wants if we just fix our release cycle. > Agreed. I still think that having two "production" releases running simultaneously really hurts focus and the end product, but that's not going to keep us from using FreeBSD. Not getting a decent five years out of a major release and not getting a minor release every 4-6 months *will* keep us from using FreeBSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1201181114520.19710>