Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:07:36 -0000
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
Cc:        Enji Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r346443 - head/tests/sys/opencrypto
Message-ID:  <dfd0f347-752d-5b77-d18b-2ec536ae1968@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <DDDCAD2D-0CFF-4E55-BB70-6C6F3798C4A0@gmail.com>
References:  <201904201543.x3KFhSAl037969@repo.freebsd.org> <fe23c154-32e3-eac6-7b1d-0ad09a938071@FreeBSD.org> <FB564B5D-127D-48E8-8C24-A954A8EFCCD3@gmail.com> <E7F620F3-65D1-472B-895F-3AFABB4DE75F@gmail.com> <3dc61795-3802-513e-93ff-3d6493eabe36@FreeBSD.org> <DDDCAD2D-0CFF-4E55-BB70-6C6F3798C4A0@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/20/19 9:43 AM, Enji Cooper wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 20, 2019, at 9:38 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/20/19 9:32 AM, Enji Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 20, 2019, at 9:31 AM, Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 20, 2019, at 9:30 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org <mailto:jhb@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/20/19 8:43 AM, Enji Cooper wrote:
>>>>>> Author: ngie
>>>>>> Date: Sat Apr 20 15:43:28 2019
>>>>>> New Revision: 346443
>>>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346443 <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346443>;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> tests/sys/opencrypto: fix whitespace per PEP8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Replace hard tabs with four-character indentations, per PEP8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is being done to separate stylistic changes from the tests from functional
>>>>>> ones, as I accidentally introduced a bug to the tests when I used four-space
>>>>>> indentation locally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No functional change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow, this is really painful for the 4-5 open reviews I have outstanding as it
>>>>> makes a merge disaster.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry ;_;…
>>>
>>> 	Being more constructive: I will back out the change, then reapply it later.
>>> Thank you,
>>
>> Ok, is it easy to reapply using a script or some such?  Also, in general I do prefer
>> this indentation as 1) it works out of the box in emacs, and 2) many of the lines in
>> cryptotest.py especially are indented pretty far over making it hard to read.
> 
> 	Yeah. I basically did `%s/	/.   /g` in vim :). Backed out via r346452.
> 	Using hard tabs in python should really be verboten, except when dealing with docstrings, etc. It’s so easy to screw up programs/introduce dead code by not indenting things consistently with four-space indents.

To be clear, I prefer the _new_ indentation.  I kept having to go back and manually
use tabify in emacs to work with the current scripts, so once my pending stuff is
drained I will appreciate having it converted.

-- 
John Baldwin





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dfd0f347-752d-5b77-d18b-2ec536ae1968>