Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:51:04 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: Darren Pilgrim <darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org> Cc: FreeBSD ISP <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>, Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Subject: Re: NFS optimization Message-ID: <44452708.6020803@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <44451E6D.5000509@bitfreak.org> References: <cone.1144794037.918896.59848.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <17475.43946.264571.52593@canoe.dclg.ca> <cone.1145294815.465429.96480.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <17475.54375.95109.55657@canoe.dclg.ca> <4444D029.8060109@centtech.com> <17476.57714.38638.380701@canoe.dclg.ca> <4444EB62.4060700@centtech.com> <44451E6D.5000509@bitfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: >> My rule of thumb for nfsd's has come down to nfs clients / 4 = > > nfsd threads. > > What would be the lower bound for such a rule? I would say 4 to be safe, but you could well get away with 1 nfsd. Above 1024, not much is gained. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44452708.6020803>