Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 18:27:29 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compiler warnings (was: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes) Message-ID: <20110530182729.GA94451@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110530174423.95220@gmx.com> References: <20110530174423.95220@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon May 30 11, Dieter BSD wrote: > > maybe we find some nice -Wwarning options which are reasonable > > to have > > -Wmissing-declarations > -Wimplicit > > FreeBSD's gcc doesn't seem to have -Wcoercion ??? > Bugzilla indicates that it was added years ago (2006?). -Wcoercion seems to have only been a SoC project in 2006 [1]. i checked gcc trunk and it's not in the gcc(1) manual. [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion > > It would be really really nice if -static worked on (nearly) everything. > > > and - most importantly - don't break tinderbox > > That's a matter of fixing the bugs before adding the warning flags > to tinderbox. > > Ports need attention. The warnings I get there are frightening. -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110530182729.GA94451>