Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:00:28 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: tcltk@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Tcl/Tk moves to the USES framework Message-ID: <20130919200028.GR86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <20130919195453.GC1560@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20130919120004.GL86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20130919124623.GZ1560@albert.catwhisker.org> <20130919131640.GM86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20130919192446.GB1560@albert.catwhisker.org> <20130919195016.GQ86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20130919195453.GC1560@albert.catwhisker.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 2013-Sep-19, 12:54, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:50:16PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > ... > > > =================================================================== > > > --- gpsman/Makefile (revision 327610) > > > +++ gpsman/Makefile (working copy) > > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > > > > > > PORTNAME= gpsman > > > PORTVERSION= 6.4.4 > > > +PORTEPOCH= 1 > > > > why this? > > To cause portmaster (et al.) to see the port as newer than it had been. > > Not necessary, and some might (reasonably) claim that rebuilding a port > merely for this type of infrastructure change is ... well, silly (at > best). :-} I see, the thing is, PORTEPOCH can never be reverted. If you really want to mark this change, I suggest you use PORTREVISION instead.. > > > Yep, there was an issue on != CURRENT. It's fixed as of r327631. > > ... > > OK; I'll hold off until tomorrow, then. Thanks! Sounds good, sorry for the annoyance! -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlI7V9wACgkQwMJqmJVx947kEwCgjRgK1S0qGk9W6VHW4muKvLgG HTAAoM4UmuZyxARPw6aqI68sMeoX9L44 =pZOD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130919200028.GR86832>