Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 08:20:26 +0100 (MET) From: Rob Simons <rob@xs1.simplex.nl> To: isp@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: BOCA 8 port -> uptime Message-ID: <199603290720.IAA09858@xs1.simplex.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From rob Fri Mar 29 08:18:44 1996 To: rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com Subject: Re: BOCA 8 port -> uptime Status: R | > > > SVR3, SVR4, FreeBSD 1.1.5 and now FreeBSD 2.1, this is one of a handful | > > > of instances where I've seen this much uptime. | > > | > > :-), I was even rather shocked when I saw the 30 day uptime!! I know that | > > FreeBSD had not fared so well on your system in the past, but it looks like | > > it has finally reached the ``stabity'' stage. | > | > Huh, why???? :-) FreeBSD fares pretty well for uptime.... Seems ok to me as well. I've been running a news machine since FreeBSD 1.0 with quite a load, and uptimes of 90-170 days are normal. It's been running 1.0, 1.1.5.1, 2.0.5 and now 2.1 with equal figures .. although 2.1 has only been installed for about a few months, no crashes so far. All this with moderate hardware btw, a 486 with only 8Mb served >4000 groups on ethernet. I did skip most binaries thoug ;-) It couldn't do news.daily within less than 22 hours otherwise. - Rob. /*--------------------------------------------------------------*\ /* Rob Simons | rob@simplex.nl *\ /* ------------ | ------------- | -------- | ------- *\ /* Novell Netware System Operator | UNIX system operator *\ /*--------------------------------------------------------------*\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603290720.IAA09858>