Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:21:32 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ? Message-ID: <202111261821.1AQILWh3077510@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20211126160454.3eb827365a02103169ab9adc@bidouilliste.com> References: <20211126160454.3eb827365a02103169ab9adc@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- Emmanuel Vadot writes: > For libvgl it probably made sense back in the 90s but does it now ?? Have you grep'ed ports ? I remember it as libvgl happened in order to support certain emulation pro= grams. Mind you, that might have been ibcs2 :-) -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202111261821.1AQILWh3077510>