Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 03:17:54 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /tmp filesystem full Message-ID: <20120823031754.0b52bed6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y71Y_cxv_qgQaMmzdx5kZHtXGuLGaxx9QQAE8QBWGL3fUA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201208221934.q7MJYfwM063804@mail.r-bonomi.com> <1345664911.2501.8.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> <CAHu1Y72xwNevgKQ8eVYYOzGC80-511DtDe8kJMWbYJm5Tq28CA@mail.gmail.com> <20120822232112.07ac3517@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120822232907.34fc82fc@gumby.homeunix.com> <CAHu1Y71Y_cxv_qgQaMmzdx5kZHtXGuLGaxx9QQAE8QBWGL3fUA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:35:29 -0700 Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:29 PM, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > Sorry I misread the previous post which *was* referring to an md > > device, but the rest is right. > > Not really. ;-) The one compelling reason to use an md filesystem for > /tmp or /var is when you have no swap, and/or your root fs is > read-only tmpfs and "swap" md devices don't actually need swap. I don't seen any advantage in your way of creating an md device for /tmp.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120823031754.0b52bed6>