Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:50:55 +0100 (CET)
From:      Bernhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@bluelife.at>
To:        "Torfinn Ingolfsen" <tingox@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: amule 2.2.3 port - ready for test
Message-ID:  <6f7772b758928744df0348d5fdb21973.squirrel@webmail.itac.at>
In-Reply-To: <ef8c8a880901180405madc0c5bw3e3a218afcad825b@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ef8c8a880901091823w7cd4a797g30d70044478e60d3@mail.gmail.com> <20090110162025.3fa38c70@chii.bluelife.at> <ef8c8a880901100828m5df08012leb05554f2287268e@mail.gmail.com> <39b650464a96fa082375cd320c27299d.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <ef8c8a880901180405madc0c5bw3e3a218afcad825b@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, January 18, 2009 1:05 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich <decke@bluelife.at>
> wrote:
>> On Sat, January 10, 2009 5:28 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I've applied your patch and compiled the port in an i386 Tinderbox for
>>>> 6-STABLE and 7-STABLE. It compiles fine but leaves a few files behind
>>>> and deletes a few directories which it shouldn't.
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing. A new patch will be sent to the mailing list.
>>> I really must get my own tinderbox running again soon.
>>
>> I've build your -5 patch and tinderbox keeps complaining about some
>> missing directories.
>
> I'm still having problems getting my own tinderbox to run. Maybe I
> should just reinstall it (it was upgraded).
>
> amule - I wonder why 'port test' doesn't complain about missing files
> like your tinderbox does?

To be exact tinderbox complains about some directories that you have
removed but you shouldn't. So just remove these lines from pkg-plist and
tinderbox should be happy with it.

portlint and port-tools are great tools for a quick check but a tinderbox
can detect a lot more errors because it builds the ports in a clean
environment so none of them can replace one another. Use them in
combination and you catch most of the errors.

-- 
Bernhard Fröhlich
http://www.bluelife.at/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6f7772b758928744df0348d5fdb21973.squirrel>