Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 11:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: i386/41930: declaration clash for ffs() and ${CXX}
Message-ID: <200305251800.h4PI0SQK079238@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR i386/41930; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: i386/41930: declaration clash for ffs() and ${CXX}
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 18:56:05 +0100
Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR i386/52474:
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 09:30:32 -0400
From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <20030520093032.C84644@espresso.bsdmike.org>
References: <200208230950.g7N9oXDs000777@terrorfish.uni.stoert.net> <20030520074754.GA95715@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
[Added BDE to CC list.]
Volker Stolz <stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > >Description:
> > when including both <string.h> and <machine/cpufunc.h> from a C++
> > source, gcc yields a declaration error:
> >
> > From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
> > I ran into the same problem today with ports/audio/mpmf20.
> > machine/cpufunc.h does set a flag if it has has been processed:
> > HAVE_INLINE_FFS (line 106 of /usr/include/machine/cpufunc.h).
> >
> > So strings.h could be modified [...]
>
> I've just been bit by another instance of this (hpoj-printer driver
> port). Are there any intentions to fix this RSN? Is there somebody
> specific who could be contacted about this issue?
> I'm cc:ing mike@ who last touched strings.h.
IIRC, the conclusion last time this was brought up was that
<machine/cpufunc.h> is an implementation detail and should never be
used by anything except the implementation.
Best regards,
Mike Barcroft
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305251800.h4PI0SQK079238>