Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 13:00:56 -0600 (CST) From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, terry@lambert.org, julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: still no response Message-ID: <199611071900.NAA11112@brasil.moneng.mei.com> In-Reply-To: <199611071849.LAA10416@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Nov 7, 96 11:49:55 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > The session number limit is set external to the inetd (think: number of > > > child processes). > > > > Yes, but that is not "per inetd, and it's compiled in". > > OK, ok: you could kludge your RC file to divorce the environment > dependency. > > I'd prefer to see the inetd limit itself based on a parameter. I am not arguing against that!! I was simply not aware that the rate limit was no longer hard coded. It would be nice to have both the rate limit AND max limit configurable from the inetd.conf file. Happy now? :-) ... JG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611071900.NAA11112>