Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:57:04 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CUURENT kernel build broken - make[2]: exec(aicasm) failed (No such file or directory) Message-ID: <20131105205704.GL7577@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <1383684017.31172.166.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <CAKYr3zzkaF=aNp=P2HMR94c54xKan5f6Fe9u28fV7yy2A_Bz6A@mail.gmail.com> <1383611766.31172.153.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAKYr3zy25fv3rCGeecgnJ0zOws2t8bV5e=_HJLAT0r2opsY11w@mail.gmail.com> <1383628194.31172.155.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20131105070146.GH1467@FreeBSD.org> <1383663652.31172.160.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20131105151251.GC7577@glebius.int.ru> <1383684017.31172.166.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:40:17PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: I> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 19:12 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: I> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:00:52AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: I> > I> > I> You were just unlucky that your updates bracketed my checkin that I> > I> > I> changed the build process for the aicasm tool so that it gets built as I> > I> > I> part of the toolchain rather than as part of the kernel now. I> > I> > I> > I> > Before this change, the toolchain was not required for kernel build if you I> > I> > aren't cross building. And now it is. This breaks the kernel build procedure I> > I> > documented in handbook for years, and brings a lot of discomfort to I> > I> > developers. I> > I> > I> > I> > Now to test a trivial change to kernel I need first to compile clang. I> > I> > I> > I> I> > I> I didn't realize the change would have that effect. Building aicasm I> > I> using the kernel build machinery just isn't an option anymore, it builds I> > I> in the wrong environment with the wrong header files and sometimes the I> > I> wrong toolchain when cross-building. But there should be a solution I> > I> that doesn't require building clang, I'll see what can be done. I> > I> > Thanks, Ian. While you are seekign solution we can sustain with depending I> > on toolchain build. I> > I> I> Okay, I think I've got a potential solution, please try the attached I> patch. Now the "make buildkernel" when the objdir is empty should build I> just the aicasm tool. (In retrospect, WTF was I thinking adding it to I> the cross-build tools? I guess cross-building is just too central to my I> world these days.) I> I> Maybe for testing you should rename your existing objdir rather than I> cleaning it out, just in case this doesn't work you can rename it back I> instead of building clang all over again. :) That worked for me. Thanks! -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131105205704.GL7577>