Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 10:23:28 -0700 From: "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org> To: "David Delibasic" <maddave@suxx.eu.org>, "Alessandro de Manzano" <adm@unixmania.net> Cc: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: NFS and WAN ? Message-ID: <004b01c11dd3$5b02ce20$3324200a@sonicboom.org> References: <20010805144104.W34298-100000@spider.suxx.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yeah I was just about to say that ipsec is the most common solution for
mapping this type of thing across the net.
Bri
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Delibasic" <maddave@suxx.eu.org>
To: "Alessandro de Manzano" <adm@unixmania.net>
Cc: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: NFS and WAN ?
> I'm running NFS over IPsec tunnel and it works fine..
>
> D.
>
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to establish a _secure_ NFS connection in a WAN /
> > Internet environment.
> >
> > I know NFS is not secure from this point of view, so I would ask if
> > someone have a solution.
> >
> > Encapsulating over SSH is not easy with all the different ports
> > needed by NFS, so what I could do ?
> >
> > Maybe running it over something like IPSec, VPNs, etc. ?
> >
> > Better alternatives ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > bye!
> >
> > Alessandro de Manzano
> > Milano, Italy
> >
> > ale@unixmania.net
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> >
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004b01c11dd3$5b02ce20$3324200a>