Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 14:29:32 -0800 (PST) From: William Woods <freebsd@cybcon.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Coleman Kane <cokane@one.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Subject: Re: FW: DSL natd rules.... Message-ID: <XFMail.000130142932.freebsd@cybcon.com> In-Reply-To: <200001302230.PAA14563@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, I am a bit confused here, I have herd that I CAN use NAT on the cisco to th the gateway/firewall/router(FreeBSD box) and then I Can't use nat on cisco to firewall if I am going to use natd on the FreeBSD box.... Which is it? On 30-Jan-00 Nate Williams wrote: >> > The original configuration worked well, and I don't think you would >> > notice any problems using the double-NAT configuration whatsoever, >> > although you could simply hook all your boxs directly to the Cisco and >> > use it that way instead, which may be easier for you. >> > >> > The NAT implementation on the cisco seemed to work quite well... >> >> I would but I want the FreeBSD box to be a firewall for the LAN > > Shouldn't be necessary with NAT on the Cisco. No-one can connect into > any internal interfaces because of NAT. > > > Nate ---------------------------------- E-Mail: William Woods <freebsd@cybcon.com> Date: 30-Jan-00 Time: 14:27:51 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000130142932.freebsd>