Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 12:41:30 -0400 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: davidg@root.com, mikebo@tellabs.com, hackers@freebsd.org, bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.1.0-951020-SNAP: Major bug in NFS again! Message-ID: <9510251641.AA13947@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <27341.814627653@time.cdrom.com> References: <199510250338.UAA27854@corbin.Root.COM> <27341.814627653@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 25 Oct 1995 06:27:33 -0700, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> said: > I agree - 2.1 is simply too close, though I see no reason why the > power-users won't be able to retrofit your solution from 2.2. Still, > this strikes me as a problem we're going to see reported often enough > that maybe we should make it a MIB variable instead of a kernel > compile option, ala the net.inet.tcp.rfc* knobs we already support. Wrong part of the MIB. You can add support for practically any NFS parameter you want under fs.nfs. There should probably be a lot more; I only implemented the statistics because of the pressing need to get `nfsstat' working with LKMed NFS. Someone who knows a lot about NFS should be able to come up with all sorts of useful parameters to tune. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9510251641.AA13947>