Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:28:18 +0100 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wither the nexus driver? Message-ID: <200206242128.18832.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20020624.133647.130619727.imp@village.org> References: <20020623233355.GE53233@cicely5.cicely.de> <200206242013.51504.dfr@nlsystems.com> <20020624.133647.130619727.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 24 June 2002 8:36 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200206242013.51504.dfr@nlsystems.com> > > Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> writes: > : On Monday 24 June 2002 4:56 am, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <20020623233355.GE53233@cicely5.cicely.de> > : > > : > Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> writes: > : > : root node is the chipset: > : > : [67]cicely9# devinfo > : > : cia0 > : > > : > OK. Is cia the only chipset, or are there others? > : > : I guess you are asking this question to decide where to put the > : implementation of child_present? Why not put it in root0? That way yo= u > : don't have to touch all the MD drivers at all. > > Yes. That's right. I didn't do that because it didn't occur to me to > do that. Since I didn't see root0 in the devinfo list on my box, I > didn't think that would work. Will it? I don't see why it shouldn't work. The root device is artificially hidden= but=20 it still exists - check out the root_driver in subr_bus.c. --=20 Doug Rabson=09=09=09=09Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com =09=09=09=09=09Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206242128.18832.dfr>