Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jan 1996 16:17:14 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        andreas@knobel.gun.de (Andreas Klemm)
Cc:        jmb@freebsd.org, isp@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD-current Proxy Server in our company (vs. Sun)
Message-ID:  <199601211517.QAA25643@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960121161817.10073A-100000@knobel.gun.de> from "Andreas Klemm" at Jan 21, 96 04:19:08 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Andreas Klemm wrote:
> 
> > 	either way a 3C509 MAY not be good enough.  the driver in 1.1.5.1 
> > lost interrupts occasionally.  i dont know if this has been fixed or not.
> 
> So what other 10MBit TP ethernet card (PCI or ISA) would 
> be recommended ?

For ISA, the beloved SMC 8013 card seems to be the overall best
choice.  The Lance chips are also fine (Am7990-based boards), they are
heavily used in many workstations.  PC NIC's with them are rather
rare.

For PCI, the DEC 2104X-based cards are certainly the first choice, or
the 3c590 with the `vx' driver pulled out of -current.  See my other
mail.  I've heard that the 3c595 doesn't run well yet (it's a 10/100
Mbit/s board).

I would generally avoid NE1000, NE2000, 3C503, 3C509 for heavy-loaded
servers.  Note that not all 8013 clones are of good quality.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601211517.QAA25643>