Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:17:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Melvyn Sopacua <melvyn@magemana.nl> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit <jakob@grimstveit.no>, marino@freebsd.org, Melvyn Sopacua <melvyn@magemana.nl>, FreeBSD Ports mailing list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Repair pkgng Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404092014390.2238@fire.magemana.nl> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1snD6=aHLz8CPbBY_SdRYomfR4wFz0fBhYmFwLPikWMNw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFVH1KULq8wfn4HDTE6L6v5hg0XQhYZFOj4QVfsCVUMZ9hTKGw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404082141290.61221@fire.magemana.nl> <CAN6yY1tAUuua5CsrZOgVnLZrk88rzFqNMi2opakejPPExROcSA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404091234120.72830@fire.magemana.nl> <534527D6.5000802@marino.st> <CAN6yY1snD6=aHLz8CPbBY_SdRYomfR4wFz0fBhYmFwLPikWMNw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, So, after the detour... >> On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: >>> Though it makes no sense in my mind. Distfiles belong to ports not >>> packages. What problem was solved by moving this? This still doesn't make sense. Distfiles are of no concern to binary packages, so why would I continue to clutter /var/db/pkg with a large tree of directories that is then duplicated to /var/db/ports? What problem in portmaster or the options framework was solved by moving this?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1404092014390.2238>