Date: 27 Jan 2003 17:48:04 -0800 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/47170: xargs(1) manpage has "utility" problems. Message-ID: <62of62jb8r.f62@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030127171926.6b7963b5.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <200301271818.h0RIIXd2052968@freefall.freebsd.org> <fuu1fujnl8.1fu@localhost.localdomain> <20030127171926.6b7963b5.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On an off the wall note, a recent commit removed the NW from > disklabel. This may help your patch ;) So you think I should remove NW from my re-worked manpage for 4.x? I looked and CVS and didn't see them removed from 4.x code. They don't work on my system, but I don't know about other architectures. Or do we assume that the 5.0 code will be MFC'd soon enough that it doesn't matter that the 4.x manpage is wrong for a while? I was suprised to see that -N, -W, and -s were removed completely, so that they are errors and so it will break old scripts. Aren't obsolete options usually left in as no-ops, at least for a long time? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62of62jb8r.f62>