Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:39:15 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: The beastie boot menu.
Message-ID:  <20041130053915.GA67455@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1101791914.41ac02aaeeb1e@imp3-q.free.fr>
References:  <20041129024602.GA23324@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <1101748454.41ab58e61eb88@imp2-q.free.fr> <FA1860B97FADCA625C68119A@[192.168.1.16]> <1101788709.41abf62519b57@imp2-q.free.fr> <20041130045622.GA51989@xor.obsecurity.org> <1101791219.41abfff31d3a7@imp1-q.free.fr> <20041130051553.GA67210@xor.obsecurity.org> <1101791914.41ac02aaeeb1e@imp3-q.free.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:18:34AM +0100, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> Quoting Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>:
> > > Colin Percival's patches:
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-March/023804.=
html
> > >
> > > Ruslan Ermilov talks about plans for a "make uninstall target":
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-March/023961.=
html
> > >
> > > Read the whole thread though, and also the "Pkg-based base system" th=
read
> > > the same month, for a sample of reactions.
> >
> > Thanks.  Both of those people are FreeBSD committers though, so I
> > don't know why you think there's "no chance of it becoming
> > mainstream".
>=20
> Scott Long is a core team member, but nonetheless decided that the boot
> menu wasn't worth the fight.

I'm not talking about that, though.
=20
> Those postings are 8 months old.  If there has been further discussion,
> obviously you're unaware of them, as I am (but I don't read the lists much
> anymore).  You're certainly aware that a lot of FreeBSD people will not
> countenance the idea.

I disagree - there's nothing controversial about allowing users to
uninstall parts of the world they installed, as long as the FreeBSD
upgrade process doesn't rely on it.

Kris
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBrAeCWry0BWjoQKURAlrQAKCmPnPE+4b4av9Tnr3ulfjTZqcKNwCg2NTr
gioyUr/6fs/j2EIRoeF1Vrw=
=gdCn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041130053915.GA67455>