Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:49 -0700 From: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> To: des@des.no Cc: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: a word of caution about the new default of so-reuseport on FreeBSD Message-ID: <CAK7dMtBbJ6GLV50uHnfSBQgU5e9Q4ed5nW=roEaWYQDuN19--w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86a7nl7dly.fsf@next.des.no> References: <e601a9fb-7805-65b2-cf08-4ad82b489849@riseup.net> <2f065155-52c2-1036-78da-f6b337c69541@NLnetLabs.nl> <b13fa7bf-c119-447b-28fc-43dc10d3d1cb@omnilan.de> <86a7nl7dly.fsf@next.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Without looking at the unbound source, I assume they want the semantics of what we call SO_REUSEPORT_LB in FreeBSD >=3D 12.0. See setsockopt(2) for a brief description. Whether it makes sense to conditionalize that or simply disable the sockopt I have no opinion on just sharing the above knowledge. Regards, On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:26 PM Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote= : > > Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> writes: > > Most likely you are aware about the "so-reuseport" topic via Unbound-us= ers. > > I didn't follow the diff/issue at all, just wanted to point it out, so > > somebody from the experts team can decide if 1.8.1 is suitable (with > > the 1.8.1 defaults) for shipping... > > I'll apply the upstream patch (r4932) before the release. Right now I > need to focus on DNS-over-TLS support. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no > _______________________________________________ > svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK7dMtBbJ6GLV50uHnfSBQgU5e9Q4ed5nW=roEaWYQDuN19--w>