Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 08:18:34 -0800 From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> To: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@sw.ru> Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, imp@bsdimp.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO_WERROR and the kernel Message-ID: <20021111161834.GZ26605@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <1037006168.686.6.camel@vbook> References: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com> <1037006168.686.6.camel@vbook>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > ? Sun, 27.10.2002, ? 02:14, Bill Fenner ???????: > > That patch adds pretty much exactly what > > > > | Revision 1.16 / Mon Jul 22 00:15:01 2002 UTC (3 months ago) by peter > > | Changes since 1.15: +0 -5 lines > > | > > | The transition time for -Werror has been gone for a while. We are now > > | sufficiently clean that we can fix any new problems or mark individual > > | files as not being ready for -Werror. > > > > removed. I think that it was to handle the case where people still had > > NO_WERROR for userland but the kernel was warning-free and wanted to stay > > that way. > > Is LINT now Werror proof ? > > I have found that > > options SC_DFLT_FONT > makeoptions SC_DFLT_FONT=cp850 > > make a lot of warnings, and can't be compiled with -Werror. Could you give us the warning messages? It seems to work fine here. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021111161834.GZ26605>